Saturday, 17 December 2022

Strictly Family - Series 20


Dates

Sept-Dec 2022 (13 weeks plus a launch show, 15 couples). The final is tonight so this is the first time in this set of posts that we cant talk about who won. The 4 finalists are all in the pic above.

 

That time period in context

In February Russia invaded Ukraine – a war that is still ongoing. In Pakistan a period of the worst floods in the country’s history began in June. In April the energy price cap in the UK rose by 54%. In July a temperature of 40º Centigrade was recorded for the first time in the UK. Omicron became the dominant variant of Covid-19 in the UK and elsewhere this year. After scandals, outrage and an outbreak of resignations, Boris Johnson was finally no longer UK PM from September. His successor, Liz Truss, lasted a mere 50 days and then Rishi Sunak became PM in October. This year the UK has also experienced its largest outbreak of bird flu. In arts and entertainment, musician Neil Young removed his catalogue from Spotify in January. CODA won best film at the Oscars in March. In May the last episode of the last series of the brilliant TV show This is Us was broadcast.

 

Judges

Shirley Ballas (head judge), Anton du Beke, Motsi Mabuse and Craig Revel Horwood.

 

Presenters

Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman (main and results shows).

Rylan and Janette Manrara (It Takes Two). I have been meaning to say for days that Heathers favourite part of ITT for years now has been the Vicky Gill costumes section. I couldnt see anything about which year Vicky first appeared on the ITT (and I cant remember) so if anyone else knows please share. She has the best laugh on TV and we think she is fab-u-lous.


Addition to format

Due to the mens football World Cup the Strictly main show took place on a Friday one week and then the semi-final was on a Sunday – truly a world turned upside down.

There was a theme week to celebrate the BBC’s 100 Years (and thank heavens that won’t be back).

This series saw the return of Blackpool week.

This time it was Neil Jones, Luba Mushtuk, Cameron Lombard and new professionals Lauren Oakley and Michelle Tsiakkas who did not get celebrity partners.

In this series there were two same sex couples in the line-up.


Dancers 

(celebrities first, professional partners second; the couples are in order of elimination but as this series has not quite finished the four finalists are last in the list but in no particular order)

Kaye Adams and Kai Widdrington
Richie Anderson and Giovanni Pernice
Matt Goss and Nadiya Bychkova
Jayde Adams and Karen Hauer
James Bye and Amy Dowden
Ellie Simmonds and Nikita Kuzmin
Tony Adams and Katya Jones (withdrew, though he was going out anyway)
Tyler West and Dianne Buswell
Ellie Taylor and Johannes Radebe

Kym Marsh and Graziano Di Prima

Will Mellor and Nancy Xu
Fleur East and Vito Coppola (new pro)

Molly Rainford and Carlos Gu (new pro)

Helen Skelton and Gorka Márquez

Hamza Yassin and Jowita Przystał


Celebrities we had heard of before the series (and how we knew them)

Kaye Adams (TV/radio presenter – not very popular in our house, some relief that she went out first), Richie Anderson (radio presenter, heard him on something like celebrity Popmaster once or twice), Matt Goss (obvs, Bros), Jayde Adams (had seen her in the brilliant comedy show Alma’s Not Normal, then watched her stand-up special), Ellie Simmonds (Paralympian, swimmer), Tony Adams (footballer, Arsenal/England), Ellie Taylor (love her on The Mash Report), Kym Marsh (singer and actor, was in Corrie). Also we knew Fleur East’s Play That Sax track (though not that she’s a radio presenter as well as a singer), Helen Skelton from TV (presenter, Blue Peter and lots of challenge type things) and Will Mellor (actor, also lots of things, daughter liked In the Club).

 

Who did we vote for?

Rather like the Tory membership, our voting was a bit of a hot mess this time. At one point or other I voted for Richie, Jayde, Ellie S, Tyler, Fleur, Molly and Hamza.

 

Celebrities we liked more after the series

Pretty much all of them.

 

Is it obvious who is going to win?

Before we attempt a prediction for this series let’s look at what makes people vote (and when I say “people”, I do wonder what percentage of the voters for this show are women, largely middle-aged/older women, like me – I’m 55). I know there may be hardcore ballroom experts and fans who vote purely based on footwork (or at least there are people who tell themselves thats what theyre doing) but I think outside of that group lots of other factors come into play. I have detailed some of these below but obviously they are just my thoughts on Strictly voting – you may have your own.

1.    Sex appeal/partner material – there does seem to be a section of the public that votes for, in particular, the blokes they find attractive. This is partly to do with dancing (a very physical activity anyway and some of the dances, and outfits, leave little to the imagination) but it is to do with other things too. This year Will seemed to be popular with “the ladies” (i.e., I kept hearing women over 30 on TV and online saying how attractive they thought he was). I couldn’t quite see the appeal (and I prefer real people to celebrity crushes really) but he had a good run and did some extremely enthusiastic dances. It should be noted that the celebrities who get this kind of attention don’t necessarily have to have an obvious “beach-ready bod” or anything. So often what we really want in our partners is, to call on Prince, just someone to help us “get through this thing called life” and so what attracts us is more to do with humour, a sense of adventure, gentleness, maybe even just an ordinariness (and I think that was part of Will’s appeal this year – he seems like an ordinary bloke, a Northern one especially, and one who might also be up to dancing with you at your friend’s wedding). With Will gone (in the semi-final) I imagine some of his voters might switch to Helen and Gorka because the latter is also very popular with “the ladies”. We are fond of Gorka in this house too (though not in that way) – he’s funny, not embarrassed to be daft or affectionate or gentle and he likes dressing up as animals. 

2.    Wanting to be the celebrity or identifying with them – sometimes I think voters vote for the dancer they most want to be or the one who feels most like them. That appeal might be to do with strength, humour, positivity, vulnerability, romance or a mixture of many things but whatever it is we see that trait or traits in the celebrity (or in the partnership) and we find it so attractive that we just have to vote for it. I think an element of the audience (and that might be largely white middle-aged women) are definitely seeing this in Helen this year (woman triumphing over adversity and over exes/men). Plus, she has done some great dancing (and there’s Gorka).

3.    The story – sometimes the personal story of the celebrity really grabs the audience’s attention. It needs to be accompanied by good (or great) dancing for a win but a good story is hard to beat. I think the story is not quite the same as the much (much!) discussed Strictly “journey”. With a contestant like Rose last year, for example, it was more a large part of the audience that went on a “journey” (learning more about deaf people) whilst Rose was just on a TV show, sharing her story, opening minds, being brilliant. Helen’s story this year (her marriage break up) might see her win the series (because even though she hasn’t talked about it in detail in the show there have been articles in the press). And its news to me but apparently she has been writing a Strictly Diary in the Daily Telegraph every week (does that paper have a Strictly Diary every year  its not a publication I follow closely). I’m sure there are some celebrities who don’t want any of their stories to be public ever and that is to be respected. Keeping the private private probably affects a celebrity’s chances of winning (because the audience is needy and greedy and we want all the emotions) but sometimes, indeed most times, there are more important things than winning a TV show. Questions are regularly asked (on Twitter anyway) about why women of colour rarely win the show and we might ask ourselves if they are less likely to bare their souls in the press and on TV (knowing the reputation of the British press and how it treats women, in general, and women of colour, in particular). Could this issue be part of the answer? Articles linked to in previous posts this month about Alexandra Burke and Nina Wadia might suggest that it is.

4.    OK, the journey – does the Strictly journey even still exist? Sometimes the word is thrown about more than a female celebrity in a showdance and its use can start to feel (a) meaningless and (b) even a little desperate (Vote for me! See how Ive grown as a person!) but by the last weeks the contestants are all so exhausted and emotional that I guess we can let it pass. Often what was talked about as the journey in the early years was simply some of the male contestants learning that dancing is fun and exciting and that men can do it too, even in daft clothes. You could see Darren Gough and Chris Hollins as journeymen of this type (and there have been others who have made similar journeys over the years without winning the show – Dan Walker in recent times, for example). A lot of this kind of journey is to do with the fact that so much of our “culture” in the last couple of hundred years has rewarded men for fighting and being competitive but has struggled with the idea of them in leotards or just generally using their minds and bodies in friendly ways. It’s a bit sad really.

5.    That one dance – as has been mentioned in many of the posts in the past 3 weeks, sometimes there is that one dance in a series that just grabs the audience’s attention and means that whatever happens, that couple will go on to win the show (Jay and Aliona’s Jive, Bill and Oti’s Couple’s Choice...).

6.    And finally, the secret ingredient – there are always lots of great dancers on the show but there are a few individuals who bring a kind of magic to their performances, even when they’re not perfect technically. It’s a look in their eye, it’s the feeling that they are almost somewhere else, and I suppose it’s something like the “electricity” of Billy Elliot. Hamza in this series has that special something for sure and unfortunately for the others, as they say in the classic disarster movie Showgirls, “whatever it is, you can’t teach it.”


So after all that theory – who is going to win tonight?

 

After their amazing week 4 Salsa with its eye-popping lifts, Hamza and Jowita became hugely popular and still seem on course for the win. Hamza was not an obvious favourite and that is one reason he has been so popular this year (the element of surprise!). He is obviously fit and strong but he does not have the stereotypical dancer’s body (I think he is the only one of this year’s finalists never to have been seen in a training VT in a crop top). Also he isnt really in the entertainment business (well, certainly not in the jazz hands wing of it, no stage school for him – he did zoology and is a wildlife cameraman and presenter). He is a Sudanese Scotsman (most often seen in his Ardnamurchan t-shirt, his practically body-length dreadlocks arranged in plaits or nets, sometimes dancing along with him) and, like Rose last year, people have fallen for him partly because he just seems such a lovely person (and he’s great mover too). As the competition has progressed he is one of those contestants who I think would almost rather not win but he has gone this far, seems honestly shocked by it and will want to do his best for Jowita. She has already proved she can win (she and partner Michael won the TV show The Greatest Dancer in 2020) and so I think this team will win Series 20 (though obviously there are always injuries/accidents/terrible showdances to watch out for). I imagine Jowita has been planning the showdance since week 4 though (no flies on her).

If Hamza and Jowita don’t win tonight it might well be Helen and Gorka who take the prize. Gorka is very popular and has yet to win a series and Helen has a big story on her side (see “story” section above). Also their Couple’s Choice to Cabaret’s Mein Herr in the quarter-final was one of those dances (straight into the Strictly history books, a big hit with the viewers, especially with the story attached). Helen and Gorka are doing the Mein Herr dance again in the final (which seems very soon to be repeating a dance) but I suppose it’s because both they and the show know that it is their best weapon (plus Cabaret songs are always big ol crowd-pleasers, I love them too, they’re hard to beat). I’d still rather Hamza won the series (the “joy of dance” candidate most often does it for me)  he skips a light fantastic and it’s great to see it.


Both Molly and Fleur are brilliant dancers who have been in umpteen dance-offs so they are less obvious winners for this year. However, Molly had a burst of good vibes in the semi-final after her Paso Doble and Carlos is delightful (and tearful) enough to win some votes so it is also possible that Molly and Carlos might grab victory in the last seconds - especially if they do a showdance to remember. We haven’t really had a story like that before on Strictly (have we?) and it might be a good one.


Fleur’s highest point in the competition was her Couple’s Choice in Blackpool and she is still (before the final) the only contestant to have received the perfect score this year. She is amazing but she and Vito just haven’t had enough of the audience reaching for their mobiles this time. At times some of the judges’ comments about Fleur seemed confused (was she fantastically powerful or should she control that power, and so on) and at least once you felt Motsi’s impatience with the whole telling-black-women-to-control-their-power business. Some half-arsed critics online find Motsi too soft (i.e., too positive) but I think she is just unapologetically human and we’re not used to that on TV (because so much on TV is pantomime). As a relative newcomer to the show and to the UK I also think she sees some of our problems more clearly than we do.

Fleur may not win but she will be a spectacular finalist and there have been many great dancers over the years who have made the final but haven’t won (John Whaite, Karim Zeroual, Faye Tozer, Ashley Roberts, Denise van Outen, Alexandra Burke, Debbie McGee, Danny Mac, Kellie Bright, Georgia May Foote, Simon Webbe, Natalie Gumede, Sophie Ellis-Bextor…). It’s a pretty solid club to be part of.

 

Were there articles in the papers moaning about one of the celebrities being good because they’d danced before?

Not that I’m aware of. Could it be possible they have tired of that worn-out old angle? Lets hope so. They often seem to moan about head judge Shirley these days instead of the dancers (articles like “Does Shirley hate women?”). Really another question might be “Does a large part of the British press hate women?” because the male judges can change their minds, talk nonsense and contradict themselves continually but it’s only a story when it’s Shirley (and I think Arlene got that treatment too). I’m not a huge fan of Shirley’s commentary (very good on dance, less good on other areas) but she’s no worse than Craig or Anton (and let’s not talk about Bruno… or Len’s pesky old walnuts).

Sometimes (sometimes!) the press has good Strictly content and evidence might be this lovely interview with Hamza from back in mid November. 

 

Did it matter?

Sorry, what was the question again?

 

Was there an obvious “shouldn’t stay in long but did” contestant?

Yes and no – Tony Adams. He was really going for it, seems a great bloke and his routines were entertaining (never underestimate the Katya factor). But for me there were many who went out before him who I would rather have seen more of. And that wasnt the best sentence Ive written this month, I apologise. Like the finalists, Im a bit tired.

Shock exit?

Lots of them. I loved Richie’s quickstep in week 2 so I was sorry The Lion King saw the end of him in movies week. I thought mega-famous Matt Goss would last longer too. 


I was also sad Jayde didn’t get more chances to dance (the dreadful BBC’s 100 Years week was her downfall  once Jayde stopped singing you couldnt really hear the rest of the words very well and the whole point about that Victoria Wood song, The Ballad of Freda and Barry, is the words and how they work). Also I would happily have watched a few more weeks of Tyler (I think he had some “joy of dance” going on too).


The story of the series

Hamza has been a story in himself – most of us didn’t know him before this series but he is quickly approaching national treasure territory. I hope he enjoys it.


This year Ellie Simmonds was the first person with dwarfism to take part in the show. She was a fabulous contestant and we loved the way she and Nikita tackled their height difference and made a positive out of it in the choreography and performances. It was interesting (and a huge relief) that the show’s regular term for a short person (“pocket rocket” – so often used for pro Janette, gymnast Claudia Fragapane and several others) was not given an airing this year for Ellie. Maybe that term can be retired from the Strictly dictionary now please as it’s really very annoying. 


The Strictly audience’s love for pro Johannes just grew and grew and he had a good series with Ellie T. In the pro dances he continued to shine and his moment as a Grease pink lady in musicals week was a highlight for us (Johannes, you’re the one we all want!). We have tickets for his live show in Aberdeen next year and are very excited.


Fleur and Molly pretty much taking turns to be in the dance off was a bit of a story this series. It has been tough going for both of them no doubt (people always use the phrase “popularity contest” for all these shows and who wants to lose one of those?) but they have made friends with each other, risen above all the nonsense and danced like champions. They are both fab-u-lous women and winners in life.


And our family - what was going on with us at the time?

So it was Covid-19 year 3 (the year people tried to pretend it was all over). In January 

I did another Fun A Day Dundee project (my third). This time I wrote about a song and its songwriter every day for the month (many of them songs I had come across at the local folk club in Montrose when we lived there, full list and links here). As part of the project I went (live!) on BBC 6 Music on Lauren Laverne’s breakfast show Social Recall section to talk about some of the songs. It was a bit nerve wracking but I managed it OK and I was thrilled that they played a few of the songs (including one by Dundee favourite Michael Marra – I don’t think I’ve heard him played on that radio station before). This is the cover of a great book about that musician and songwriter written by James Robertson.

It was a really weird day because after all that radio excitement we got a call at teatime to say Mark’s Mum, Isobel, had died in Leeds. She had been ill for a few years but still the end, when it comes, is always some kind of shock. I had written a poem a little while earlier about her and her husband Allan – they were such a team, well matched and happy together for so long (their wedding pic from 1962 below). Mark’s sister read the poem at Isobel’s funeral service which was nice (the poultry being useful after all).

We had a few funerals in 2022, none of them Covid-related (one of my sisters, a former boss/colleague of Mark’s). Also in the summer I went to an event to celebrate the life of a local musician who had died the year before. It was called Pauline Fest and the musician was Pauline Meikleham (sometimes known as Pauline Hynd). Again I wrote a poem (predictable I know) and this time I read it at the event (you can read the poem and about Pauline here). It was an amazing day with brilliant music and people, all in the lovely setting of Hospitalfield in Arbroath (some of the decor below).

In May Heather and I had some Strictly action – we went to Oti’s live show I Am Here in Perth. It was weird to be back in a venue with lots of people but the show was phenomenal.


And this year Covid did catch two of us. Heather got it in the summer and we had to miss a big family wedding and gathering in Leeds (she was distraught!). I got it in October and barely slept for a month (insomnia and headaches my biggest symptom). Luckily I recovered in time for our now annual family fancy dress photo shoot. This year we went for Devil Wears Prada (although one of my old friends thought it was Acorn Antiques…). 

And now it’s Strictly season again and Heather, now 22, has graduated, got a job and just recently moved to her own place. I wonder now, as I do every December, if we will still watch Strictly together next year and if I can stand another year of it. I complain, as I always do, about what my Mum got me into all those years ago and think of everything else I could have done with all those hours Ive spent watching Viennese Waltzes. But I suppose we probably will watch it* because Strictly may be tiresome and noisy and quite often ridiculous, but it’s also autumn and cheerful and, after all these years, something like family. Family can be anything – it can be hundreds of people or it can be you and a cat and the cast of Corrie – its just whatever works for you. And to finish with a bit of my family, the pic below is a painting by our friend Scott Henriksen of my Strictly-loving Mum and daughter, from a photo of them taken in 2006. Big hugs everybody.

Thanks to everyone whos been following the posts, spread out as ever on mouldy old Facebook, dying Twitter, past-its-best Instagram and is-it-going-to-be-a-thing Mastodon. The only comments that will last are the ones on the blog itself so if you fancy leaving one on this last post that would be great (you dont need an account, just comment anonymously and then write a name, any name, at the end of the comment if you like). Maybe say who you think will win this year or share a particular memory of watching the show over the years, any favourite dances or contestants, or your least favourite lifts (ours is the one I call the gusset lift where the female dancer is lifted up high, legs wide open, displaying her gusset to the world – why on earth would anyone ever want to do that?). Anyway, gussets aside, I am off to go and get ready for Xmas (I have been neglecting other tasks while doing this mini PhD in Strictly). I hope you have enjoyed this (dont say it!) journey with me and keeeep doing whatever makes you happy (whilst at the same time helping others – its cold out there, in every sense, and only getting colder).



*Unless they ever get a royal on board or Boris Johnson or Matt Hancock or...


If you want to read any of the previous posts just click Older Post below till you get to the one you want. Or use these links: Series 1Series 2Series 3Series 4Series 5Series 6Series 7Series 8, our Dancing with the Stars interludeSeries 9Series 10Series 11Series 12Series 13Series 14Series 15Series 16Series 17Series 18 and Series 19.

Friday, 16 December 2022

Strictly Family - Series 19

Dates

Sept-Dec 2021 (13 weeks plus launch show, 15 couples).

 

That time period in context

So this was Covid (year 2) with more lockdowns announced in January (in England and Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were still locked down from December). The dominant variant in the UK was Delta from mid 2021. On 6 January the Capitol Attack in Washington DC saw Trump’s supporting mob trying to “save America” because he had lost the election. In August in Afghanistan the Taliban captured Kabul and took control of the country as US and UK troops were withdrawing. In autumn COP 26 took place in Glasgow. Emma Raducanu won the tennis US Open in September aged 18. The hugely successful TV series It’s a Sin was shown on C4 in Jan/Feb 2021 and the brilliant comedy We Are Lady Parts in May. The South Korean show Squid Game was huge on Netflix in September. Disney’s Encanto came out in the November (and you might well ask the question – is its hit song We Don’t Talk About Bruno a reference to Signor Tonioli’s seemingly eternal stint on the US show Dancing with the Stars?).

 

Judges

Shirley Ballas (head judge), Anton du Beke (new judge), Motsi Mabuse and Craig Revel Horwood.

 

Presenters

Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman (main and results shows).

Rylan and Janette Manrara (It Takes Two). Janette was a new presenter for ITT this year and the first pro dancer to be given this role.


Addition to format

Again, there was no Blackpool visit.

The Couple’s Choice category was made more flexible – not restricted to a few styles as before.

This time it was Luba Mushtuk and 2 new pros, Cameron Lombard and Jowita Przystał, who didn’t get a celebrity partner.

Dancers 

(celebrities first, professional partners second; couples listed in order of elimination with winners last)

Nina Wadia and Neil Jones

Katie McGlynn and Gorka Márquez

Robert Webb and Dianne Buswell (withdrew)

Greg Wise and Karen Hauer

Ugo Monye and Oti Mabuse

Judi Love and Graziano Di Prima

Adam Peaty and Katya Jones

Sara Davies and Aljaž Škorjanec

Tom Fletcher and Amy Dowden

Tilly Ramsay and Nikita Kuzmin (new pro)

Dan Walker and Nadiya Bychkova

Rhys Stephenson and Nancy Xu

AJ Odudu and Kai Widdrington (new pro)

John Whaite and Johannes Radebe

Rose Ayling-Ellis and Giovanni Pernice

 

Celebrities we had heard of before the series (and how we knew them)

Nina Wadia (actor, Goodness Gracious Me), Robert Webb (comedian, Mitchell and Webb/Peep Show), Greg Wise (actor, Sense and Sensibility), Judi Love (comedian/presenter, Celebrity Gogglebox), Adam Peaty (swimmer), Tom Fletcher (didn’t know his name but knew his face as McFly front man, mainly because they were in the Lindsay Lohan film Just My Luck and Heather was a big Lindsay fan in her tween/teens), Dan Walker (BBC presenter).

 

Who did we vote for?

TV presenter AJ and new pro Kai for the most part. AJ was brilliant and it was clear from quite early on that actor Rose and Giovanni were probably going to win so I didn’t think they needed our vote too. We liked both couples equally but AJ danced like she was on fire and I loved it.


Celebrities we liked more after the series

Rugby player Ugo was fun and charming, Judi Love was fun and funny.


We’ve never watched Bake Off so we didn’t know John Whaite at all (he won that show in 2012) but he was really lovely and we were glad he and Johannes did so well. Rhys was a sweetheart and it was great that Nancy got such a good start with her first partner. 

AJ, as already mentioned, was fabulous and funny and a force of all the good things. And of course Rose was magnificent and such an individual – she did the show just the way she wanted to. She was the first deaf person to take part and she was gorgeous in every way – strong, delicate, fierce and hilarious.

 

Was it obvious who was going to win?

Yes. Rose and Giovanni didn’t always get the best scores but they were magical to watch and they were getting good scores as early as week 3. I think most of the viewers, indeed the country, fell a bit in love with Rose (or at least wanted to be her best friend).

Were there articles in the papers moaning about one of the celebrities being good because they’d danced before?

Not that I remember. They were taken up with romance stories again I think (some of them way off course).

 

Did it matter?

Nope.

 

Was there an obvious “shouldn’t stay in long but did” contestant?

Dan Walker, I suppose. A section of the audience kept supporting him for the “he hasn’t danced before and he’s trying really hard” storyline. I didn’t mind him (and it was nice for his pro Nadiya to get a good run) but there were others I would have preferred to stay in.


Shock exit?

Nina Wadia. She was the first to go out which was a real shame as she started well and would have been a great contestant. Unusually for Strictly (I think) she was quite open about being fed up to get kicked off early and I found that honesty admirable. She questioned the judges’ marking (hardly the first person to do that – especially some of Craig’s wilder low scores) and in doing so made herself look like a bit of “bad sport”, pretty brave considering the obsession with being a “good sport” in some quarters of the UK and that much of the UK press don’t need much encouraging to target a woman of colour with negative stories (we talked about that back at Series 15). People are allowed to be disappointed, to feel they’d put themselves into an intimidating format and not been given the best chance (we don’t have to agree with them, but they can say it, it’s their life and public image after all). Unless you are already confident in the activity in question (dancing, ice skating etc.), going on these shows is pretty courageous in the first place (especially for a woman over a certain age) and I think showing an honest, human reaction is fair enough. Nina even talked about the show negatively affecting her mental health (here) and I do think some judges might keep that in mind when making their comments and giving scores. It might be hilarious to have a dig but how deep can you go before it’s too far? Maybe her words have had some effect as I would say there have been less catty comments in the 2022 series. Or maybe thats just Motsis good influence on the other judges.


The story of the series

Everything about Rose. Also the series taught hearing people that many of them know very little about deafness or deaf people.

John and Johannes being the first same sex couple in the final was a big milestone. They were accepted by the audience, loved and supported, why had it taken so long?

AJ was fabulous in every way but unfortunately, due to an injury, she couldn’t dance in the final. There’s always something to make you cry in the final but this time, for me, it was AJ’s story.

 

And our family - what was going on with us at the time?

Covid-19 still dominated everything and we were still much more home-based than before the pandemic. We were still using Zoom/Teams for work (and more) and we enjoyed lots of online events like the Glasgow music festival Celtic Connections in January and, for Heather, the Janette and Aljaž Oscars show later that year (she’d had tickets for the live show but that was cancelled, like so many things). Heather and I rewatched some favourite TV shows like Mum and Fosse/Verdon to get through the (very snowy) winter. I also did another Fun A Day Dundee writing project in January to help me with dark winter days. This time I wrote a poem/post a day about every place I’ve ever lived (called 31 Postcodes, first one here).

At the end of March, Mark and I got our first Covid vaccinations at the huge Caird Hall in town. It was like a social event (if one mainly for people in their 50s, all a couple of metres apart and not allowed to use their phones). 

In April Heather turned 21 and the best we could manage was turning the car into some kind of disco (fairy lights and all) and driving her round for a couple of outside visits, pizza by the sea and so on. Luckily her now very favourite public person (the actor/comedian Andy Samberg, pic at top of post of what was left of her cake) had a new film on streaming that week (suitably enough the time-loop Palm Springs) so that was definitely a happy birthday treat for her. She first met (and fell for) Samberg in the sitcom Brooklyn Nine-Nine which she watched in the first lockdown in 2020, though in fact the first series went out originally in 2013. In 2021 Brooklyn Nine-Nine showed its final episode (to much sadness in this house). Strictly, on the other hand, rolls on for another year…


Much of the year (socially) was spent outside, avoiding variants. We had trips to England (especially Mark as his Mum was back in hospital in Yorkshire, various times, and then in a care home by the end of the year, though she never caught Covid). When he wasn’t doing that he rediscovered a love of being on the water from his youthful scouting days (kayaking, rowing, anything boaty). 


I hadn’t been doing a lot of poetry stuff in lockdowns but I had two commissions that summer that were a bit special (2 wedding poems for siblings that were getting married the same year, both after a few postponements). The irony is never lost on me that my most successful moments in poetry have nearly all been wedding-related (I’ve never been married, never wanted to be married, find the whole business pretty baffling to be honest – I’m all for love but marriage has never appealed). One of my other love poems is even listed on various wedding sites (in amongst Burns and other obscure folk). Both of this summer’s wedding poems ended up being so moving that they even made me cry. I’m wasted on this blog business, you know.


If you want to read any of the previous posts just click Older Post below till you get to the one you want. Or use these links: Series 1Series 2Series 3Series 4Series 5Series 6Series 7Series 8, our Dancing with the Stars interludeSeries 9Series 10Series 11Series 12Series 13Series 14Series 15Series 16Series 17 and Series 18.

Thursday, 15 December 2022

Strictly Family - Series 18


Dates

Oct-Dec 2020 (9 weeks plus a launch show, 12 couples). The calendars for each series (like the annuals) very confusingly have the following years date on (see above). As if the series number being 2 years behind the year wasn’t confusing enough for someone trying to do a blog series... Still, only 2 series left to go!

 

That time period in context

The first two cases of Covid-19 in the UK were confirmed on 30 January. Then on 31 Jan the UK left the EU – quite a week. After a bout of fervent handshaking and blustering about it all being nonsense, infector in chief Boris Johnson announced the first UK lockdown on 23 March (there were several more to come). Obviously, the lockdown rules didn’t apply to MPs or government advisers (silly us, for thinking they might). The message to Dominic Cummings must just have been a quick text saying “you do you, babe” or something along those lines.

After the murder of George Floyd by police officers in the US earlier in the year the summer saw global protest in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. There was a US election in November and Biden/Harris won. The first Covid-19 vaccination (in the world) was given in December (in Coventry, England).

The theatrical release of the brilliant film The Personal History of David Copperfield in the UK was in January. DJ/producer Andy Weatherall died in February. The TV version of Sally Rooney’s novel Normal People was on TV in April. Michaela Coel’s I May Destroy You was on the BBC TV in the early summer (another series with a really, really strong last episode –triumphant writing). In November Douglas Stuart’s novel Shuggie Bain won the Booker Prize for Fiction. And finally, possibly the worst Xmas film of all time came out in December (sorry, Scotland, I love you dearly but the Lost at Christmas is really, really bad, even with some great talent in the cast). It’s on the i-player this year if anyone wants to try it. We laughed for all the wrong reasons (the sex scene at the end... hilarious).

 

Judges

Shirley Ballas (head judge), Motsi Mabuse and Craig Revel Horwood.

Anton du Beke stood in for Motsi when she had to travel to Germany (Covid rules).

 

Presenters

Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman (main and results shows).

Zoe Ball and Rylan (It Takes Two). Series 5 contestant Gethin Jones stood in for Rylan for a couple of weeks (Covid restrictions).

 

Addition to format

The first same sex couple in the competition (boxer Nicola and pro Katya).

Fewer couples this year and a shorter run. To keep fans going until the later start date a couple of “best of” shows were broadcast (featuring musicals week dances and finals).

No Blackpool visit this year (Covid restrictions).

No Halloween week this year (Covid restrictions)

Just 3 judges this year (Covid restrictions).

No partners this year for pros Neil Jones, Nadiya Bychkova, Graziano Di Prima and Nancy Xu.

Dancers 

(celebrities first, professional partners second; couples listed in order of elimination with winners last)

Jacqui Smith and Anton du Beke

Jason Bell and Luba Mushtuk

Nicola Adams and Katya Jones (withdrew, Covid issues)

Max George and Dianne Buswell

Caroline Quentin and Johannes Radebe

Clara Amfo and Aljaž Škorjanec

JJ Chalmers and Amy Dowden 

Ranvir Singh and Giovanni Pernice

HRVY and Janette Manrara

Jamie Laing and Karen Hauer

Maisie Smith and Gorka Márquez

Bill Bailey and Oti Mabuse


Celebrities we had heard of before the series (and how we knew them)

Jacqui Smith (politician), Nicola Adams (boxer), Caroline Quentin (actor, though can’t say I’ve ever watched any of her big shows – Men Behaving Badly, ugh, or Jonathan Creek, my Mum loved that one), Clara Amfo (Radio 1 DJ), Jamie Laing (only because he was in Strictly last year, for the launch show, then left with an injury), Bill Bailey (comedian/actor/TV presenter).


Who did we vote for?

Nicola (we were excited about the first same sex couple on the show), then Clara (she was brilliant  that Charleston in week 4!), then finally HRVY (we loved their Chorus Line American Smooth, plus pro Janette – all these years and this was her first final … but it was not to be). We did enjoy Bill and Oti too but we knew they had a big vote so we felt Janette and HRVY needed the support more.


Celebrities we liked more after the series

Nicola, Clara (love her!), news presenter Ranvir, actor Maisie, Bill (we already liked him but he was great on Strictly too). 

Was it obvious who was going to win?

I suspect Bill and Oti were always the majority choice. Both already had their own following and there was so much good in their partnership but their slick, joyful Couple’s Choice to Rapper’s Delight in week 4 probably clinched the deal. The new most-often-seen Strictly click article seems to be “Ban Couple’s Choice – it’s not fair and it ruins the competition!” but really, some of us have been watching this show for nearly 20 frickin’ years and we really need variety and for the show to change and grow. There are only so many waltzes a person can watch in their life if they’re not actually that bothered about ballroom dancing (yes, I admit it – I have watched the show for all these years and yet I’m not that fussed about the top line or the heel leads, it all looks bloody uncomfortable and bad for your back if you ask me). I’m happy for the ballroom to continue but we need the other stuff too – it’s Saturday night TV, spice up our lives (especially in lockdown).


Were there articles in the papers moaning about one of the celebrities being good because they’d danced before?

Hopefully with the global pandemic and the criminal Tories (led by Lord Walloper of Wallpaper, the laziest man at the most significant time), our piddly press had something better to do than recycle some of the same old Strictly material. But did they..?

 

Did it matter?

Well, the Tories are still in power so someone’s not doing their job very well (and I include the Labour leadership in that category – they have been the weakest opposition that is humanly possible in recent years).

 

Was there an obvious “shouldn’t stay in long but did” contestant?

Jamie Laing – last year’s injured non-starter did too well for my taste (though we’re always pleased for pro Karen). For me, Clara Amfo should have been in that final.


Shock exit?

Clara. 

 

The story of the series

Finally, the first same sex couple took part in the competition. I suspect most people would have expected two men to break the mould so having two women (boxer Nicola and one of Strictly’s most memorable pros Katya Jones) was a nice touch. I read that the issue was forced because Nicola would only take part if she had a same sex partner (and if that’s true, more power to her, using her fame for good and not evil). Unfortunately, the pair had to withdraw after week 3 (Covid related) but it was a great start and after all the much-muttered fears and fuss (would the show have a same sex couple or not? Would the oh-so-delicate public be able to cope?) it was just suddenly part of the show and no stranger than Craig’s facial expressions or Tess’s way of saying Salsa. In the most recent series (2022) there were 2 same sex couples and behold, the world has not ended (well, not for that reason). Watching how the pro dancers (whatever their sexuality) have embraced the development is really lovely too. 


This series saw the 1st pro to win twice in a row (Oti, first with Kelvin then with Bill).


This series also saw the oldest winner – Bill was 55 when he lifted the glitterball.


This series was the first to feature an ex-military contestant in the main show who had been disabled in service (Cassidy Little had taken part in a previous Comic Relief Strictly mini series The Peoples Strictly in 2015). JJ is now a TV presenter but was a Royal Marine and injured in Afghanistan. Something about TV coverage of military issues in light entertainment often makes me uncomfortable (it can be a bit saccharine, never mind the unquestioning nature of the way the issues are presented), but I understand that Im not really the target audience for those sections. He did really well and was popular (and was another Scotsman to don a kilt for one of his dances).

And the other story – Covid, of course. This was the first Strictly Covid year. For fans having the show on at all was such a saving grace for 2020. I know our daughter was thrilled to have at least one normal thing that year and with Xmas quite trimmed back, Strictly was a very welcome gift for her in 2020. I’m sure it was the same for many other fans.

 

And our family - what was going on with us at the time?

Like most people we started 2020 not knowing much about Covid-19. In January I took part in my first Fun A Day Dundee (a friendly community art project that happens most years). I wrote and illustrated a poem, one word a day, it was the beginning of the one-a-days that has led to this mighty undertaking. There are a few of the illustrations in this section (they all had a musical link).

We had an Edinburgh trip in February so Heather could see the musical Six that she had heard so much about (it’s quite the phenomenon – a bit like going to a Little Mix concert with added history lessons). I’ve been to a lot of musicals with the daughter and they can blend together a little but this one was loud and full-on but still funny and interesting (with a rave throwback here and there). I really kind of liked it. Plus Katherine Howard made me cry.

Once lockdown began we worked at home, studied at home (the 3 of us plus dog). We did the music quiz Popmaster with our lunch (pretty much every day – family harmony maintained by Radio 2’s Ken Bruce). We did Zoom quizzes and Zoom exercise, we did a lot of cooking and walking. I got into audiobooks (the longer the better), especially in the bath. Heather and I had a musicals week (at home) the week Hamilton made it to TV which involved just watching a musical every night (we didn’t have to come up with an Oklahoma-themed Argentine Tango or anything). In July Mark turned 50.

Mostly, we made the best of it where we could (knowing others were having much tougher times, working in hospitals, care homes etc. or being properly isolated and afraid). I was wary of the doorstep-clapping to begin with (it seemed tokenistic when the UK Government were making so many terrible, criminal, decisions) but when I read that some workers did feel more valued as a result we joined in with the weekly applause. Some people felt hemmed in locked down in cities but Dundee is a city with a lot of nature in and around it, with seaviews and hills, so I didnt feel too claustrophobic (and I do have a tendency in that direction  dont sit with me on a plane, or even a train, its not pretty). Here is a shot from the top of the Law in Dundee in March 2020.

In the summer I persuaded Heather to try writing a blog to make up for the lack of activities and human contact (it’s here). It’s about musicals she’s seen and about life in general (sound familiar?). She has collected programmes from every show she’s seen (and been in) and that was the starting point for the project.

Unlike many, we didn’t lose anyone close to Covid but Mark’s Mum (now in her 80s) did spend a lot of this (hot) summer in various hospitals in Leeds (and never got Covid, quite the achievement). We went down to see her when allowed but she had a lot of isolating in 2020 and it was tough in many ways. We knew a few other people who were ill in 2020 too and everything was especially tough for them (the added risks, the limitations, the anxiety) – a lot of that still hasn’t gone away. One of these people, Fi Munro, who’d been very public about her ovarian cancer, died in the summer of 2020 but not long before that she had been on national radio talking about death and how we deal with it (one of many issues she felt strongly about and campaigned around). I listened to that interview on headphones in the garden in April of that year, enjoying hearing Fi talk with her usual humour and feistiness, making her mark on life. It was a year of extreme feelings, no doubt about that.


If you want to read any of the previous posts just click Older Post below till you get to the one you want. Or use these links: Series 1Series 2Series 3Series 4Series 5Series 6Series 7Series 8, our Dancing with the Stars interludeSeries 9Series 10Series 11Series 12Series 13Series 14Series 15Series 16 and Series 17. Back tomorrow for Series 19 (2021) – a Rose is a Rose...